Condoleezza Rice: Wicked Witch of the West
Scroll down for "Condoleezza Rice versus Harold Pinter"CONDI'S THEATRE OF THE ABSURD
It’s happening, isn’t it? The fog is lifting. Enormous shifts of opinion at the last minute. And not just about the wars. About the belief system that sustains the wars, the dark hearts of those who run the wars, the malice of a media that sells the wars.The climax has been a long time coming and is still unfolding. The Wicked Witch of the West flies to Europe to deliver a major speech, one that explains why US torture isn’t really torture.
To deprive a wounded suspect of sleep, stand him in a freezing cell for “long hours”, tie him “feet-up to a water board” and dunk him under water until the brink of death, is within the law.
How come? Because President Bush says so. Secret CIA kidnappings in foreign countries are also legal, according to Condoleezza Rice, because anyone loosely deemed an “al-Qaeda affiliate” and “far from their original home” is “effectively stateless” and eligible for kidnap.
By this definition Condoleezza herself is “effectively stateless”, as are the agents of the CIA, who are also former al-Qaeda affiliates. Thus, they too can be “legally” abducted and transported to torture chambers.
This is absurd. And that’s the point. The Rice doctrine, first delivered at Andrews Air Force base in Maryland on Dec 5, and since re-iterated during her European whistle stop, is a tactic that pushes the art of spin beyond the edge of sanity.
It does for truth what the Atomic bomb did for Hiroshima.
“The United States does not permit, tolerate, or condone torture under any circumstances”, she claims, even as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) posts forty-four US Military autopsy reports that provide “indisputable proof that detainees are being tortured to death while in US military custody”, and highlights extensive abuse of US detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan from 2002 through to 2004.
Former US army colonel Lawrence Wilkerson, until recently chief of staff to Colin Powell, has told the BBC that between 70 and 90 prisoners have died in “questionable circumstances”. But you know all that, as will many who heard Rice’s ridiculous speech. Ridiculous on purpose.
In the same week that British playwright Harold Pinter formally accepts the Nobel Prize for creating his macabre comedy of contradiction, Condoleezza Rice puts the Theatre of the Absurd onto the global political stage.
Suddenly, secret renditions and waterboarding are “permissible under international law”, she tells the Germans, who must be astonished. Such techniques didn’t go down so well at Nuremburg.
Even the CIA was caught on the hop. Remember their March 2003 gangster-style kidnap of “radical cleric” Abu Omar from the streets Milan?
The CIA assumed it was against the law. That’s why they phoned the Italian anti-terror police and put them off the scent with a deliberate lie: “Omar’s fled to the Balkans”.
Actually, he was being bundled to Egypt for a spell of water sports and “environmental manipulation” (Rumsfeld’s term for inducing hypothermia, an illegal practice he authorized in April 2003). The lie was unnecessary, according to the Rice doctrine, because any unlawful acts committed by Americans abroad are now lawful.
Neat, huh? But some nations are slow to catch on. In Condoleezza’s view, the Italians have failed to “adapt” to the Alice in Wonderland worldview.
"The kidnapping of Abu Omar was not only a serious crime against Italian sovereignty and human rights”, fumes Armando Spataro, the lead prosecutor in Milan, “but it also seriously damaged counterterrorism efforts in Italy and Europe.
"In fact, if Abu Omar had not been kidnapped, he would now be in prison, subject to a regular trial, and we would have probably identified his other accomplices."
Italian authorities are still seeking the extradition of 22 CIA operatives, but they haven’t got a hope in hell. The Roman Empire is long gone. Another Empire bestrides the world, making up the law as it goes along.
CONDI RICE VERSUS HAROLD PINTER
Ironically, at the same time as Condoleezza Rice enters the realm of the absurd, a master of the genre, Harold Pinter, enters the stage as a statesman. Both speeches were delivered in the same week, and are worth comparing.
RICE: The United States and many other countries are waging a war against terrorism. For our country this war often takes the form of conventional military operations in places like Afghanistan and Iraq.
PINTER: The invasion of Iraq was a bandit act, an act of blatant state terrorism, demonstrating absolute contempt for the concept of international law.
The invasion was an arbitrary military action inspired by a series of lies upon lies and gross manipulation of the media and therefore of the public; an act intended to consolidate American military and economic control of the Middle East.
A formidable assertion of military force responsible for the death and mutilation of thousands and thousands of innocent people.
RICE: International law allows a state to detain enemy combatants for the duration of hostilities. Detainees may only be held for an extended period if the intelligence or other evidence against them has been carefully evaluated and supports a determination that detention is lawful.
PINTER: Look at Guantanamo Bay. Hundreds of people detained without charge for over three years, with no legal representation or due process, technically detained forever. This totally illegitimate structure is maintained in defiance of the Geneva Convention.
It is not only tolerated but hardly thought about by what's called the 'international community'. This criminal outrage is being committed by a country, which declares itself to be 'the leader of the free world'.
RICE: The United States is a country of laws. My colleagues and I have sworn to support and defend the Constitution of the United States. We believe in the rule of law.
PINTER: The US quite simply doesn't give a damn about the United Nations, international law or critical dissent.
RICE: We consider the captured members of al-Qaeda and its affiliates to be unlawful combatants who may be held, in accordance with the law of war, to keep them from killing innocents.
PINTER: How many people do you have to kill before you qualify to be described as a mass murderer and a war criminal? One hundred thousand? More than enough, I would have thought. Therefore it is just that Bush and Blair be arraigned before the International Criminal Court of Justice.
RICE: The United States [and its allies] will use every lawful weapon to defeat these terrorists.
PINTER: We have brought torture, cluster bombs, depleted uranium, innumerable acts of random murder, misery, degradation and death to the Iraqi people and call it 'bringing freedom and democracy to the Middle East'.
RICE: Torture, and conspiracy to commit torture, are crimes under US law, wherever they may occur in the world.
PINTER: At least 100,000 Iraqis were killed by American bombs and missiles before the Iraq insurgency began. These people are of no moment. Their deaths don't exist. They are blank. They are not even recorded as being dead. Bush has been clever. He has not ratified the International Criminal Court of Justice.
SO there you have it, the voice of truth, justice and sanity doing battle with the Devil’s spinners. Which voice is which, is for each individual to decide. But once decided, it is up to you to play your part. At this point in history, silence becomes an act of complicity. This is the turning point. The chance won’t come again. Richard Neville @ OpEd News
I just want to thank you for all the time and effort it takes to put this
site together.
If you feel like I do, then you are sick of being told how to feel and how
to act. Pinter is not a 'leftocrat'-he did not bring up abortion, gay
rights, religious fundamentalism or arguments against capitalism. He merely
stated facts-he is a primary source of history with respect to Nicaragua.
Yet, those who identify themselves as part of the 'right' feel like they
must react; we will hear about Pinter being unbalanced and unfair, but
those who say this were not there and are other taking the word of 'the
powers that be,' who by the way are trusted without merit or intelligent
debate. Those who consider themselves 'the left' are only making things
worse; condoning the idea of a "marketplace of ideas" is so twisted and
hurtful to democracy that very soon critical debate will be replaced by
blind acceptance of engineered sentiment. Why do we feel that being gay
means being anti-war? Why do we feel that our voice will not be heared
unless we adhere to the 'left' or the 'right'? When will we realize that
this polarization of America is making it easier to rip the country in
half? We should all be ashamed.
Bush is a liar, of course-as are all of his thugs...and thugeses
I am fed up with the "International Community". It seems to act against
those states and "terrorists" who somehow impede the progress of the
building of America the beautiful. Why did they invade Iraq we might ask.
Well, Condi would say "to rid the world of a ruthless dictator, who killed
thousands of his own people". I say what about Robert Mugabe, what about
Hosnei Mubarak, what about the leaders of Burma? If you hold up the reasons
why the Americans took over in Iraq, why, the world powers should invade
the USA. America has invaded all their neighbours, have weapons of mass
destruction and have killed their own people. Were these reasons not the
central thesis of President Bush's case against Iraq? I think any half wit
can see it was all just so much Bushshit. We condemn the President of Iran
for insulting Israel and saying we should send them back to Europe, but we
praise Ariel Sharon as a man of peace after he effectively wipes Palestine
of the map, slaughters thousands of locals, invades all his neighbours
orchestrating masacres in refugee camps in Lebanon. He makes shameless land
grabs throughout the region and ignores UN Resolutions, not for a dozen
years like Saddam, but for fifty years. He has been part of the power
structure in Israel since its inception and one of the world's most
infamous war criminals, yet the "International Community" cannot speak
against him because six million Jews died in a war so long ago. Have we
forgotten the five million Armenians killed in the first war, the twenty
million Russians who died fighting Hitler and a couple of million who died
at the hands of Stalin. Ten milliom Muslims died in Mao's "Cultural"
Revolution. I guess these lives like the 100,000 Iraqi civillians killed so
far aren't worth as much as a couple thousand American "brave boys" who
gave their life for a better Iraq. I think I'm going to gag. It's just a
good thing that the President of the free world is limited to two terms,
but we all know that "democracy" in the USA is determined by the Pentagon,
the CIA and the pen pushers in Washington. Maybe the next President will
have the backbone to make serious changes. We can only hope.
Wouldn't Condi be more useful to the US if she just stuck to picking cotton
in her sharecropper daddy's cotton fields/?
