ed strong

Search

 

Daily Email

Receive a daily email digest: the headlines and summaries of articles posted each day. Click below.

Mailing List

««Nov 2009»»
SMTWTFS
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930
...

This Website contains adult content which may include images and videos of a sexually explicit nature. If you are under 18, please leave the site now.

FRIDAY 6 NOVEMBER

Ana Washes All Over in My Bathroom [10,136]

Sexy Teenage Girls [Kendra] [9,141]

Everyone Masturbates in the Bathroom [7,564]

Porn Postcard from Paris [7,492]

Fucking Body Heat! [5,477]

Photo Gallery [11.05.09] [5,246]

Teenage Sex Drive Beats Belief in God [3,150]

Unpicking Capitalism: 'Success' [1,766]

Unpicking Capitalism: 'Individualism' [1,628]

Unpicking Capitalism: 'Competition' [1,439]


THURSDAY 5 NOVEMBER

Lucy [Most Desirable Adolescent] [8,940]

Sex'n'Art: Erotic Porn [8,522]

Voluptuous Italian Porn Star Fucks [7,576]

Jayden Cole's Kitty [5,833]

Erotic Lesbian Playtime [5,757]

Sexy Teenage Girls [Sian] [4,859]

Photo Gallery [11.04.09] [4,417]

Sex Toys Sell Well in the Recession [No Work, More Masturbation] [2,981]

Obama May Abandon Afghanistan [1,605]

And God Created Capitalism [1,496]

Widening Wealth Gap, Even in Retirement [1,432]


WEDNESDAY 4 NOVEMBER

Utterly Stupendous Teen Sexuality [5,718]

Katie & I Go Camping [5,198]

Photo Gallery [11.03.09] [5,103]

Vintage Porn Image [4,604]

Lesbian Initiation [4,076]

Ava - Teenage Temptress [4,040]

Sexy Giselle Strips [3,742]

Big Pharma Creates FSD [Female Sexual Dysfunction] [1,719]

Welcome to the Billionaire Bailout Club [1,566]

Liberalism Is a Capitalist Ideology [1,535]

Free Market Stalls [Death of US Economic Ideology] [1,482]


TUESDAY 3 NOVEMBER

Get a Fucking Grip! [12,027]

Cool, Desirable Annie [9,892]

Hands-on Orgasms [7,941]

What a Fuck! [7,557]

Top Five Explicit Sex Shots [5,188]

Photo Gallery [11.02.09] [4,893]

Catfighting: New Season [4,262]

Anti-Porn Puritan Crusade [2,736]

Under Obama: Losing Hope for Change [1,649]

Wall Street: Rich White Guys with Snouts in the Trough [1,583]

High Unemployment Will Continue for Years to Come [1,455]


MONDAY 2 NOVEMBER

"Fuck Me in the Bath" [11,106]

My Teenage French 'Cousin' [10,979]

The Perfect Porn Image [9,825]

Fucking Orgasm! [6,195]

Photo Gallery [10.31.09] [4,983]

Old School: Lesbian Munching [4,211]

Top Five Erections [3,940]

Sexual Repression: America's Puritanical, Prudish Culture [3,462]

The Rise & Rise of Neoliberal Capitalism [1,693]

What's Wrong with Wall Street? [Fewer Banks, Too Big to Fail] [1,609]

The Great Recession & Consumer Debt [1,588]


SUNDAY 1 NOVEMBER

Glass Dildo: A Girls Best Friend [6,788]

Two Pretty Kitties [6,524]

Clip Joint [6,042]

"Sexy Bitch" [Two Versions] [5,955]

Porn Star, Joanne Guest [5,702]

Photo Gallery [10.30.09] [5,561]

Striptease: More Tacky Than Tasteful [4,738]

Erika & Elaine [Two Hot Bitches] [4,640]

Clara Morgane: French Pop Diva [4,463]

Lina: Phew! What a Scorcher! [4,195]

Sexy Chic [4,070]


MOST POPULAR [LAST 7 DAYS]

1. Masturbating Schoolgirl in Classroom [35,533]

2. Fucking Position [Great Shot] [33,139]

3. The Voyeur: Watching Her Come [31,307]

4. Porn Clip: Teenage Couple Fucking [27,388]

5. Lorna, Post-Coital [22,804]

6. Modern Women Pleasure Each Other [21,516]

7. Holy Shit! What a Vulva! [18,992]

8. Ashley Masturbates on the Washing Machine [18,565]

9. Saucy Teen Cheerleader [18,070]

10. Girls Just Wanna Have Fun [17,625]

11. Female Orgasm Facts [Clip] [17,602]

12. Dirty Washing! [17,543]

13. "Can I Make That Harder for You" [16,790]

14. Webcam Teen Undresses [15,752]

15. Controversial Lingerie Clip from Germany [15,733]

Hollywood's Infatuation with Stupid Boy-Men Behaving Badly

posted Friday, 14 September 2007

You know the guy

He has a monosyllabic retro name

like Hal or Earl or Chuck,

mildly wacky hair and a death grip

on his adolescence

He's got frat house furniture

and dependency issues with his friends,

and is hapless or commitment-phobic with women

"Chuck & Larry"

Commentators have found as many reasons

for the phenomenon as there are examples of it

It's because white males

are safe targets of ridicule

It's the work of feminist critiques

of the '50s passive homemakers.

Some think it sanctions

the infantilism of male culture

Others think it's simply

a reflection of changing economics

That advertisers are aiming for women,

the primary spenders of many households' discretionary incomes

Pairing a bumbling, oddly employed male lead with a hot can-do woman is the current rage in Hollywood.

The Ben Stillers and Adam Sandlers gradually brought it to the big screen, but this summer Judd Apatow seems to have elevated the trope to a new level of success.

First there was the June release of Knocked Up, a film that matched a successful TV interviewer to a man whose primary working relationship was with his bong.

Then, teen couples in the August hit SuperBad were too young to mismatch careers, but unless porn consumption counts as extracurricular credit, their college tracks were assuredly divergent.

September will bring us The Brothers Solomon, about a pair of socially awkward siblings' efforts to spread their seed, as well as Good Luck Chuck and Run, Fatboy, Run, which, as their titles hint, only further the trend.

Commentators have found as many reasons for the phenomenon as there are examples of it. It's because white males are safe targets of ridicule. It's the work of feminist critiques of the '50s passive homemakers.

Some think it sanctions the infantilism of male culture. Others think it's simply a reflection of changing economics, that, A, advertisers are aiming for women, the primary spenders of many households' discretionary incomes.

And, B, because women are achieving new levels of occupational success.

Females outnumber men in most colleges, and while nationwide incomes still aren't equal, younger women in cities like New York are now earning more per hour than their male counterparts.

Hollywod's Love Affair With Immature Men

You know the guy. He has a monosyllabic retro name like Hal or Earl or Chuck, mildly wacky hair and a death grip on his adolescence. He's got frat house furniture and dependency issues with his friends, and is hapless or commitment-phobic with women.

The Act One diagnosis is usually that he just "needs to grow up."

No, not Michael Vick. Though the Falcon quarterback's explanation for dog fighting -- "I need to grow up" -- does show just how ubiquitous the Peter Pan excuse has become.

Male leads in recent popular TV shows and movies are increasingly portrayed as victims of their own immaturity.

If only instead of claiming he had found Jesus, Vick had said he'd found some fantastically attractive and accomplished woman, perhaps the viewing audience would've gone along.

In today's romantic comedy scripts, the man-child always meets his Wendy. Only through the innate, successful, high-achieving grace of a female may our hero be saved.

Taken one at a time, it's easy to pass off this trend as a simple, comedic trope. But considering the storyline's popularity and how it is affecting gender relations at large, this narrative is worthy of closer attention.

Pairing a bumbling, oddly employed male lead with a hot can-do woman is the current rage in Hollywood.

The Ben Stillers and Adam Sandlers gradually brought it to the big screen, but this summer Judd Apatow seems to have elevated the trope to a new level of success.

First there was the June release of Knocked Up, a film that matched a successful TV interviewer to a man whose primary working relationship was with his bong.

Then, teen couples in the August hit SuperBad were too young to mismatch careers, but unless porn consumption counts as extracurricular credit, their college tracks were assuredly divergent.

September will bring us The Brothers Solomon, about a pair of socially awkward siblings' efforts to spread their seed, as well as Good Luck Chuck and Run, Fatboy, Run, which, as their titles hint, only further the trend.

TV echoes what the New Yorker's David Denby calls the "slacker-striver" dynamic.

Promos for the new NBC comedy "Chuck" pan from a svelte blond spy to a disheveled computer techie earning, a low voice intones, "Eleven bucks an hour."

In HBO's The Flight of the Conchords, one of the parody folk singers is unemployed. The other holds signs. Both get dates.

And if the men and women are all similarly employed, as in Scrubs or The Office, when it comes down to it, the women tend to wear the proverbial pants.

Commentators have found as many reasons for the phenomenon as there are examples of it. It's because white males are safe targets of ridicule. It's the work of feminist critiques of the '50s passive homemakers.

Some think it sanctions the infantilism of male culture. Others think it's simply a reflection of changing economics, that, A, advertisers are aiming for women, the primary spenders of many households' discretionary incomes.

And, B, because women are achieving new levels of occupational success.

Females outnumber men in most colleges, and while nationwide incomes still aren't equal, younger women in cities like New York are now earning more per hour than their male counterparts.

As put forward by books like Alpha Girls, the casting of women as confident high-achievers isn't so much a sitcom cliché as it is a cultural truth.

No matter its source, the archetype of the superwoman is a surely an improvement over the pre-Mary Tyler Moore moms, beer babes and cop-show rape victims.

These women are smart and capable, and striving in enviable jobs. Perhaps they should even be flattered to play savior to the opposite sex. But for as potentially insulting to men and empowering to women, a look at the credits should give one pause.

A sampling of the genre's writers' first names: Steve, Bob, Judd, Seth, Evan, Jeremy, Jay, Mike, Tom, Thomas, Matt, Nick, Josh, George, Chris, Michael, Josh, Peter, Sean ... not even an ambiguous Sam in the bunch.

Women fair a little better in television comedies. Of the eleven writers credited for The Office, two are women. One of the five producers of "Chuck" is female.

Still. While men are certainly capable of creating fair representations of the sexes, the dearth of these scripts' women writers begs the question of who this narrative actually benefits.

In his New Yorker piece, Denby argues that "the perilous new direction of the slacker-striver genre reduces the role of women to vehicles. Their only real function is to make the men grow up ...

"They don't have to dress for dinner, but they should challenge the men intellectually and spiritually, rather than simply offering their bodies as a way of dragging the clods out of their adolescent stupor."

This type of one-dimensionality bears many dangers. For one, the sort of playful exasperation with which these women tolerate their mate's boyhood antics makes light of their own needs.

They act as if women are only too happy to play mother to lovers and children alike.

This narrative also ignores the fact that aging is a shared experience. Knocked Up depicts one women's inability to get into a night club because she's too old.

But, in general, shows like this act as if women march unflinching toward responsibility, immune to the terrors of responsibility themselves.

It also perpetrates some of the larger ageist tendencies in our culture. Women enjoying youthful pastimes in their later 30s and 40s are often portrayed as cougars or desperately sad. Men grow up. Women just get older.

Fact is, as long as women are not playing the leads, their parts will be more caricature than character.

The less you know of someone, the easier they are to idealize or demonize. The trick is realizing the former is just as unfair as the later.

As an interesting contrast to these superwomen plots, one only need watch the one show actually written, produced and acted by a woman.

On 30 Rock, Tina Fey, the first female head writer of Saturday Night, plays Liz Lemon, the head writer of a fictional sketch comedy show The Girlie Show.

While she has a high-powered job and is accountable for a cast of less-than-mature men, she hardly has her shit together.

A monologue from last season had Lemon venting to a potential love interest:

I have been sexually rejected by not one but two guys who went to clown college.

I get super-nervous whenever I hear a vacuum cleaner, because when I was a kid my mom used to turn on the vacuum to drown out the sound of her and my dad fighting.

Which is why I rarely vacuum my apartment. Like, never. I have had three doughnuts so far today. Once in college, I pooped my pants, a little bit, at a country steaks all-you-can-eat buffet.

And I didn't leave until I finished my second plate of shrimp. A couple months ago, I went on a date with my cousin. Wow, I am a mess ... And I lied. I have had five doughnuts today.

A recent article in Bitch magazine argued that Lemon's "hilarious incompetence" is a cop-out to sexist stereotypes, but in today's comedic culture, I would disagree.

Fey's character often baby-sits her co-workers, but she never feigns pleasure at it. She dates losers, but when they are caught on Catch-the-Predator shows, she breaks up with them and does not take them back.

She worries about her caloric intake, but she plays it such that it's part of her neurosis, not her strength. At a fabulous party, she orders "pinot grigio: Is that OK?" In short, she's flawed. She's human. What's more feminist than that?

Also, compared to most sitcom mockups, in 30 Rock, male buffoonery is never confused with political impotence. Her boss, Jack Donaghy, as played by Alec Baldwin, is a mama's boy.

That doesn't mean his power is never soft-pedaled. "I wasn't going to fire you," he scoffed at a subordinate last season, "I just wanted to remind you I could."

Fact is, for all the so-called alpha girls flooding the workplace, we're still looking at an 84 percent male Congress.

For as much as women wield power in romantic comedies, in 2006, only 15 percent of all directors, executive producers, producers, writers, cinematographers and editors of the top 250 domestic grossing films were women. That's less than it was in 1998.

It's nice that the media has such confidence in women when they are scripting their female love interests and casting their doc dramas.

Maybe it even will influence public perception on what they are capable of. But until more women start making the media themselves, it's hard to imagine characters of either sex will be allowed to truly grow up.

tags:        

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. Michael left...
Thursday, 13 September 2007 8:42 pm

Howard Stern just inked a $500 million dollar deal for doing the same comedic routines my friends & I did when we were 12 at the 7th grade lunch table. The man is in his mid-50's and makes a living from penis & poop jokes and getting well paid for it. Kids aren't stupid: work your ass off and go to college so maybe you can earn 1/10,000th of what Stern makes is a losing proposition.

We don't have an immediate external crisis to galvanize us to become men.

PC has gone too far shunning - even outlawing - a lot of male behavior. In many instances, we aren't allowed to be men.

Most boys are growing up without a male role model. And kids today are growing up as weenies thanks to ridiculously over-safe rules & parents. There's some lessons in life that people, men especially, will only learn the hard way: sometimes you've gotta let your kids get a little burn from a hot stove.

Modern education serves to weed out creativity, independence & responsibility and instead urges conformity and obedience. Children are perpetually infantilized and critical thinking - adult thinking - is absolutely discouraged.

Men are unable to leave the nest at 18 - a generation ago, folks were buying houses at 20, 22 years old. Young people don't live with their parents because they want to, but because they have to, because economics forces them to. It's difficult to be a man or to grow up when you're living under someone else's roof.

The options for men over the last thirty years has shrunk, along with their pay and overall status in society, while women's choices have expanded.

Finally, the average man today cannot make enough money to be the sole provider for his wife and family and that's as emasculating as life can get...surely there's some psychological consequence to all of this?