ed strong

Search

 

Daily Email

Receive a daily email digest: the headlines and summaries of articles posted each day. Click below.

Mailing List

...

This Website contains adult content which may include images and videos of a sexually explicit nature. If you are under 18, please leave the site now.

THURSDAY 26 NOVEMBER

Volatile Fuck [8,106]

Fucking Girls [7,278]

Mistress Sarah Sits on His Face [6,931]

Tempting Teen [6,570]

Gorgeous Blonde in Paris [6,018]

Bathing with Veronique [4,922]

Photo Gallery [11.25.09] [4,159]

Is Porn Too Posed? - 15 Minutes of Suck & Fuck [Clip] [3,994]

Reality TV Hits Rock Bottom [1,732]

Afghanistan: Obama Intensifies Imperial Folly [1,677]

American Casino Capitalism [1,418]


WEDNESDAY 25 NOVEMBER

Teenage Taunt [Anya] [6,874]

"Rosie, I Want to Fuck You" [6,181]

Photo Gallery [11.24.09] [5,937]

Unbelievably Desirable! [5,369]

Pleasuring Herself & Us [5,608]

Nina Hartley & Peter North Fuck [Retro Porn] [5,211]

Fucking Phallic Symbol [4,915]

Designer Vaginas: "A Homogenised, Pre-Pubescent Genital Appearance" [4,060]

During Recessions Capitalism Increases Exploitation [3,462]

Bourgeois Anxiety & Horror Films [1,783]

Barack Obama: Fallen Idol [1,622]


TUESDAY 24 NOVEMBER

Tantalizing Young Female [Most Popular - Last 28 Days] [13,275]

Elisa "Hangs Out" in My Kitchen [12,026]

Gymnastic Fucking [8,533]

I Love Erotic Porn! [7,104]

Machine-Made Fucking [6,841]

Teachers Can Have Sex with Students [I Should Hope So] [4,700]

Nubile Girls [Sarah] [4,092]

Photo Gallery [11.23.09] [3,718]

Khalid Shaikh Mohammed Show Trial [Hang Him High] [1,777]

Wall Street Finds New Ways to Milk Old Mortgages [1,585]

Obama Fails the Working Class [1,563]


MONDAY 23 NOVEMBER

Fucking Domination [9,951]

Teenage Popsicle [2] [9,882]

Most Magnificent Arse [8,466]

Fucking Hot! [6,195]

Photo Gallery [11.22.09] [4,834]

Sultry Erotica [4,237]

Shawna Lenee [The Stuff of Porn Stars] [4,113]

Fascinating Sex Survey [3,480]

Oprah Winfrey & The Dumbing Down of America [3,382]

From Poker Player to Trader on Wall Street [1,553]

Protecting Us from Credit Card & Mortgage Hustlers [1,544]


SUNDAY 22 NOVEMBER

Awesome Orgasm! [11,786]

Mighty Fine Nudes: Nubile Girl with Older Woman [11,450]

Anna's Beautiful Vulva [9,772]

Fuck [Sexually Charged] [9,135]

Exciting Sex [7,983]

Expression: Sexual Ecstasy [7,540]

Czech Super-Beauty Monika Vesela [6,687]

Gorgeous Nessa in "White Romance" [6,484]

Photo Gallery [11.20.09] [5,881]

Marta Goes Through "Metamorphosis" [5,511]

Chiara Is Hot in "Chichi" [5,247]


MOST POPULAR [LAST 7 DAYS]

1. Porn Clip: Teenage Girl Is Sexually Roused [24,559]

2. Teenage Popsicle [24,437]

3. Exciting Sex [2] [23,182]

4. Porn Clip: Getting Women Off [21,866]

5. "Munch Me, Man!" [21,246]

6. Porn Clip: Fucking in the Laundry Room [21,114]

7. In the Throes of Feeling Herself [18,750]

8. Lusty Young Lorna [17,516]

9. Natalia on My Balcony [17,348]

10. Retro Porn: Classic Fuck [17,286]

11. Karen Flashes Me in the Park [17,112]

12. Porn Clip: Sasha Grey Tied Up & Fucked [16,427]

13. Porn Clip: Delicious Teenage Strip [16,072]

14. Suicide Girl [15,989]

15. Porn Clip: Tease, Strip, Masturbate [For Your Pleasure] [15,966]

Miley Cyrus to Promote Safe Sex? [Flog the Blog 08.05.08]

posted Wednesday, 6 August 2008

1. Will Miley Cyrus Sell Condoms?

2. An Attack on Iran Could Triple the Price of Oil

3. The Imploding Economy

4. Imperial Arrogance: A "Just" War in Afghanistan?

5.The NYT: Making Nuclear Extermination Respectable

6. Obama: Shilling for Israel

Semi-Naughty Cellphone Photos

Miley Cyrus to Promote Safe Sex?

Hot on the heels of last week's contraceptive debate comes a fresh piece of news that is bound to stir the pot among condom fans and haters alike:

Condom manufacturer LifeStyles is courting Miley Cyrus, Hannah Montana star and one-time Vanity Fair pinup, to be its new spokesgirl.

Cyrus seems an unlikely candidate. At 15 she is younger than the age of consent in most states and once infamously (and unoriginally) proclaimed her intention to stay a virgin until marriage.

Fearing for the already doomed reputation of the Hannah Montana brand's flagship starlet, the Cyrus camp has already denied that any deal with LifeStyles is in the works, and it's pretty much certain that they wouldn't accept it anyway.

Despite LifeStyles' offering of $1 million and a lifetime supply of prophylactics to secure Cyrus as the face of safe sex, we're probably never going to see Billy Ray's baby on the side of a box of condoms.

This, to me, seems like a huge loss. Not only for Cyrus (lifetime supply!) but also for young girls who look to her as a trendsetter for both clothes and behavior.

Modes of sexual practice seem to follow a trickle-down pattern, with women passing on their wisdom and advice to those less in-the-know.

Miley Cyrus, role model to millions, is therefore in an ideal position to promote a healthier example for young women who are probably already contemplating or having some form of sex.

Her celebrity endorsement could be the first since that of Lisa "Left Eye" Lopes to significantly de-stigmatize condoms among teens and reverse some of the bad PR they've been receiving lately.

As we've seen, teen celebrities' vows of virginity are hardly guaranteed to stave off unplanned pregnancies, nor have they proven inspirational among their peers.

And it's unsurprising that the threat of pregnancy and STDs doesn't stop teens from having sex altogether when it doesn't even stop grown Jezebels who should know better.

So what are Miley's people afraid of? That she's too young to know about condoms?

I see denying contraceptive education to teens as akin to preventing alcoholics from entering rehab just because they're too young to legally drink: blind adherence to an ideology that's being flouted at large.

Do they fear for her future earning power? It's unlikely that Cyrus' endorsement of LifeStyles would derail her seemingly unflappable star.

Her career would continue, albeit probably not with Disney, which has reacted less than happily to displays of sexuality by its young stars in the past.

And what's more, Cyrus would be free to keep her promise of premarital chastity (though that, too, seems doubtful).

Cyrus' promotion of safe sex needn't be a promotion of licentiousness. It should simply prompt young women to be more scrupulous and pragmatic about the choices they make, encouraging longer, healthier lives among those who've already made up their minds to have sex.

The Price of Oil, Tripled? An Attack on Iran Could Make It Happen

An attack on Iran, which Israeli and Bush administration officials appear set to carry out if Iranian uranium enrichment is not halted, would ignite a regional war in the Middle East and lead to economic collapse and political upheaval in the United States.

“In short and simple terms, we would be plunged into a depression that would make the Great Depression of the 1930s in which I spent my childhood look like boom times,” said William R. Polk, former professor of history at the University of Chicago and a member of the Policy Planning Council under President Kennedy.

“Industries would fail, banks would collapse, government revenues would dry up, universities would have to close, health care, even as limited as it now is for roughly 75 million Americans, would virtually cease. In short, something like [what] the South suffered at the end of the Civil War would plague the country.”

Capitalism in Crisis: The Imploding Economy

It's looking really bad. but , even now, the two presumptive major party presidential candidates are talking about everything but this deepening crisis.

They are debating terrorists and Afghanistan and how to leave Iraq without leaving, but not the reality that so many Americans are living with: a squeeze that is leaving so many of us broke, deeper and deeper in debt and disgusted.

Until now, the doom and gloomsters were mostly to be found in the margins, in financial blogs or in the campaigns of Ron Paul, Ralph Nader or the Greens.

The mainstream media has often been looking the other way and mostly downplaying the unfolding disaster.

Even as foreclosures double, and the price of gas and food rises sharply, it's been business as usual on the business pages, and among the liberal political pundits who would rather debate the cover of the New Yorker than the growing desperation of so many Americans.

Imperial Arrogance: A "Just" War in Afghanistan?

Afghanistan is the 'good war,' aimed at 'those who attacked us,' in the words of columnist Frank Rich. It is 'the war of necessity,' asserts the New York Times, to roll back the 'power of Al Qaeda and the Taliban.'

Barack Obama is making the distinction between the 'bad war' in Iraq and the 'good war' in Afghanistan a centerpiece of his run for the presidency.

He proposes ending the war in Iraq and redeploying U.S. military forces in order 'to finish the job in Afghanistan.'

Virtually no one in the United States or the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) calls for negotiating with the Taliban. Even the New York Times editorializes that those who want to talk 'have deluded themselves.'

But the Taliban government did not attack the United States. Our old ally, Osama bin Laden, did.

Al-Qaeda and the Taliban are not the same organization (if one can really call al-Qaeda an 'organization'), and no one seems to be listening to the Afghans.

The NYT: Making Nuclear Extermination Respectable

On July 18, 2008 The New York Times published an article by Israeli-Jewish historian, Professor Benny Morris, advocating an Israeli nuclear-genocidal attack on Iran with the likelihood of killing 70 million Iranians – 12 times the number of Jewish victims in the Nazi holocaust:

“Iran’s leaders would do well to rethink their gamble and suspend their nuclear program.

"Barring this, the best they could hope for is that Israel’s conventional air assault will destroy their nuclear facilities.

"To be sure, this would mean thousands of Iranian casualties and international humiliation. But the alternative is an Iran turned into a nuclear wasteland.”

What does the publication by the New York Times of an article, which calls for the nuclear incineration of 70 million Iranians and the contamination of the better part of a billion people in the Middle East, Asia and Europe, tell us about US politics and culture?

For it is the NYT, which informs the ‘educated classes’ in the US, its Sunday supplements, literary and editorial pages and which serves as the ‘moral conscience’ of important sectors of the cultural, economic and political elite.

Obama: Shilling for Israel

Obama's statements to assure Israel on his proposed talk with Iran are most alarming. He has tirelessly repeated that the "military option" remains on the table to ensure Israel's security.

Isn't this the exact same policy trademark infused during the Bush administration, which eventually led to the war on Iraq? The US will exhaust every diplomatic channel, but the "military option" remains on the table.

This was the gist of the message repeated by the warmongers of the White House through Bush's two terms. Does one need any proof of why such an attitude is not reflective of well-intentioned diplomacy?

What is equally dangerous in Obama's uttering is that he might be, and is already, feeling pressured to balance his seemingly soft attitude towards Iraq and Iran by exaggerating his country's pro-Israel stance in a way that will derail any possibility for a peaceful solution to the Palestinian- Israeli conflict, at least during his term.

In fact, ominous signs of that pressure, and his succumbing to it are ample, the last of which was his statement, prior to his visit, that Jerusalem must remain undivided, a position that negates international law and the consistent tradition of various US administrations, including Bush's.

One need not repeat what Obama has said during his visit to Israel, for such rhetoric is becoming most predictable.

His "commitment" to Israel and to the ever "special relationship" that unites both nations were generously invoked. Obama promised to do his utmost to keep Israel secure and to stop Iran from obtaining the atomic bomb.

As for the Palestinians, he seems keenly interested in engaging their non-democratic forces and shuns those who dare to challenge his country's biased official line that has contributed in myriad ways to the ongoing conflict.

tags:        

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit