ed strong
This Website contains adult content which may include images and videos of a sexually explicit nature. If you are under 18, please leave the site now.

Daily Email

Receive a daily email digest: the headlines and summaries of articles posted each day. Click below.

Mailing List

SUNDAY 5 OCTOBER

Naked Sex: Top Ten Toss-Offs [1] [3,934]

We All Eat, Drink, Shit & Masturbate [Flog the Blog] [2,340]

Today's Front Page Photos [10.03.08] [1,698]

Ahmadinejad Makes Sense [882]

Bristol Palin Wedding: Will the Bride Wear White? [858]

YouTube Is Revolutionizing the Music Video [Six of the Best] [842]


MOST READ [29 SEPT-4 OCT]

1. Crazy Christians & Teenage Virgins: Brides of Bush? [31,320]

2. Bitch, Ho & the White Man's Sexual Hang-Ups [18,364]

3. Sex Photos: Sharon E - A Women to Die For! [10,498]

4. 21: Fantasy Five Explicit Videos [10,334]

5. Teenage Lesbian Nymphets! [9,006]

6. Sex Photos: Crossing Boundaries [1] [8,002]

7. Dirty Sex! [5,839]

8. 11: Top Ten Tasteful Nudes [5,694]

9. 2: Softcore Porn Videos [5,672]

10. Naked Sex: Top Ten Turn-Ons [3] [5,270]

11. 49: Last Week's Center-Spread Sex Photos [22-27 September] [4,985]

12. In Praise of Prostitution [3,922]

13. Sex Matters [3] [3,726]

14. Having Sex? Don't Forget to Warm Up [3,541]

15. Sex Talk: Low Libido Blues [3,100]


FRIDAY 3 OCTOBER

Naked Sex: Top Ten Turn-Ons [3] [2,825]

No More Faking Orgasm! [Flog the Blog] [1,538]

Today's Front Page Photos [10.02.08] [1,372]

25: Top Five Viral Videos [1,272]

Obama Progressive? Is the Pope a Protestant? [769]

America Needs Socialism [Bailing Us Out] [630]


THURS 2 OCTOBER

2: Softcore Porn Videos [2,306]

Having Sex? Don't Forget to Warm Up [Flog the Blog] [1,357]

Today's Front Page Photos [10.01.08] [1,284]

America Shatters [709]

Most Popular Articles ['Dirty Video'] [702]

Laissez-Faire Capitalism Is Dead [520]


WED 1 OCTOBER

Dirty Sex! [Flog the Blog] [2,110]

11: Top Ten Tasteful Nudes [2,081]

Today's Front Page Photos [09.30.08] [1,159]

Mother-Fucking Nightmare on Wall Street [803]

Sarah Palin: Barbie Doll Goes to Washington [795]

Financial Collapse: Decline & Fall of Empire [593]


TUES 30 SEPTEMBER

Bitch, Ho & the White Man's Sexual Hang-Ups [15,204]

Sex Photos: Crossing Boundaries [1] [2,793]

Sex Talk: Low Libido Blues [Flog the Blog] [1,579]

Today's Front Page Photos [09.29.08] [1,452]

Maureen Dowd on the Debate: Is Obama Frightened to Fight? [866]

USSR: The United States' Socialist Republic [731]


MONDAY 29 SEPTEMBER

21: Fantasy Five Explicit Videos [3,722]

Teenage Lesbian Nymphets! [Flog the Blog] [3,317]

Last Week's Center-Spread Sex Photos [22-27 September] [1,738]

Sex Matters [3] [1,529]

Best of the Week [21-26 September] [1,042]

««Oct 2008»»
SMTWTFS
   
1
2
3
4
5
6
7891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031

Sex & Politics: Which Candidate Will Stand Up for Teenage Sexuality?

posted Tuesday, 8 July 2008

Over the past eight years, the tide has shifted

so drastically against adolescents. Since 2000,

teens have faced a rise in abstinence-only education,

hurdles to obtaining Plan B emergency contraception

and a hike in the price of birth control pills

Teenagers Are Entitled to Healthy Sex Free from Condemnation

Sex education regressed into the Dark Ages under Bush

Which candidate will now stand up for teenage sexuality?

According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, almost two-thirds of female adolescents have had sex by the time they reach their senior year of high school.

As a pediatrician, doing my job well means I talk with teens about their sex lives. In many cases, an adolescent will reveal she's sexually active and probably has had one to three partners.

That means I'm testing them for sexually transmitted diseases, performing pelvic exams to make sure they don't have signs that can lead to cervical cancer later, and discussing and prescribing contraception -- abstinence, condoms, Plan B and birth control pills.

This kind of comprehensive approach to teen sex has been successful. Teens have been waiting longer to have sex, and teen pregnancy rates dropped by almost 30 percent between 1990 and 2000.

If they are sexually active, teenage girls have reported having fewer partners and are more likely to use some form of contraception than in the past.

So it's been perplexing and frustrating to see that over the past eight years, the tide has shifted so drastically against adolescents.

Since 2000, teens have faced a rise in abstinence-only education, hurdles to obtaining Plan B emergency contraception and a hike in the price of birth control pills.

In a campaign season notable for so much youth participation, it's worth exploring which of the presidential candidates is standing up for this important age group.

Shortly after President Bush took office, he began pushing abstinence-only sex education, where teens learn that the only way to prevent STDs and pregnancy is to wait to have sex until they're married.

If or when abstinence proponents do mention contraceptives, they greatly exaggerate their failure rates to scare teens into believing they are useless. Funding for abstinence programs has grown to around $180 million annually.

While Bush has been signing checks, doctors have spent the better part of his terms reviewing the science behind his dogma.

According to the Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health, the nation's largest study of teen behavior, kids who took abstinence vows kept them for just a little over one year.

Worse, pledgers who failed at abstinence were less likely to use contraception when they had sex. Further, the study shows that in the past six years, the prevalence of STDs has been similar between pledgers and nonpledgers.

It doesn't get any better as we look at access to emergency contraception.

In 2002, Plan B's maker applied to the Food and Drug Administration for approval to sell it over the counter, something that just about every medical organization in the country supported, based on sound science.

Several studies have demonstrated that girls who have access to Plan B use it properly and do not change their safe-sex practices; that is, they still use condoms or oral contraceptives.

So it was good news in 2003 when an FDA panel overwhelmingly approved the idea. But when the decision reached the agency's highest levels, the FDA balked, bowing to political pressure from congressional Republicans and religious groups.

Thankfully, the Democratic minority in Congress fought back, and in the end got what it wanted -- sort of.

In late 2006, Plan B was approved to be sold over the counter, but with two caveats. First, Plan B was approved only for women over age 18. Minors still need a prescription. Second, "over the counter" meant over the pharmacists' counter.

Today, reports persist of pharmacists refusing to provide the drugs to customers, usually on religious grounds. One instance, in Texas, occurred after a woman who had been raped came to a pharmacy with a prescription from her doctor.

Finally, as if politicos were going for a hat trick, there was last summer's revelation that the price of oral contraceptives was going up for college students.

Traditionally, Big Pharma has given campuses a break on the price of birth control pills. But the 2005 Deficit Reduction Act put an end to that, as the government cut drug reimbursements to pharmacies.

Suddenly, an $8 to $12 charge for a month's worth of birth control spiked to between $30 and $50. That priced out a whole lot of young women from protecting themselves.

While a dreamy religious conservative might argue that the spike will also price teenage girls out of having sex, think again. Most first-person reports tell us that women's sex lives haven't changed.

Now, however, they're having riskier sex, relying only on condoms or depending on Plan B as birth control, taking it after each episode of intercourse, something it's not approved for.

There has been nearly a decade of disconnect between Washington and young women. If you have any doubts about the consequences, consider that the teen pregnancy rate recently rose for the first time in 15 years. That prompts the question: Who's going to stand up for teens over the next 10 years?

If your voting will be influenced by this issue, John McCain isn't your guy. His lack of interest and insight into the issue was best summed up during an interview last March, captured by the New York Times, on his Straight Talk Express bus:

Q: What about grants for sex education in the United States? Should they include instructions about using contraceptives? Or should it be Bush's policy, which is just abstinence?

McCain: (Long pause) Ahhh. I think I support the president's policy.

Q: So no contraception, no counseling on contraception. Just abstinence. Do you think contraceptives help stop the spread of HIV?

McCain: (Long pause) You've stumped me.

McCain does support Bush's ideologically based policies. He has voted against legislation to ensure that sex education be scientifically accurate instead of just abstinence based, has voted to impose parental consent for teens seeking birth control, and has opposed legislation that birth control be covered by insurance.

He has also voted against programs to increase awareness about emergency contraception.

So, where does Barack Obama stand on sex education? He has been a solid supporter of reproductive rights.

Perhaps his strongest stance was in cosponsoring legislation to reverse the birth control price hike last fall, but he hasn't pushed it forward.

In 2007, he also introduced a bill to reduce teen pregnancy in minority communities.

But it's a little odd, for someone who has attracted so much energy and support from young people, that Obama doesn't have any stance or position on his campaign Web site about any of these reproductive issues.

The closest thing I could find was "Healthcare" under "Issues," where at the bottom he has a bullet point about women's health. But he makes no specific mention of reproductive issues.

On the other hand, his stances and statements in other places are quite clear.

When members of his staff were interviewed about his positions on reproductive issues in 2007, they pointed out that he had a "100 percent rating from pro-choice groups."

And that he was "an original co-sponsor of the Prevention First Act, which will ensure that all taxpayer-funded federal programs are medically accurate and include information about contraception."

Finally, they noted that "in December 2006, Obama went to 'the political equivalent of the lion's den' when he told a conservative Christian audience in Southern California that abstinence-only education was not enough."

In the face of a war in Iraq and a staggering economy, sex education for teens may not loom large on voters' minds.

But with so many young Americans deeply engaged in this election, they deserve to know the facts about where their candidates stand on an issue that affects them this personally. As a doctor and a parent, I want those issues upfront as well.

The last thing I want to see is my time with teens restricted by views or laws that force me to bury my head in the sand.

Restricting access to reproductive education and choices is not good for any young person's health.

tags:            

links: digg this    del.icio.us    technorati    reddit




1. David left...
Sunday, 6 July 2008 11:59 am

Interesting how "personal responsibility" never figures into this...

I know, I'm an evil capitalist or religious fundamentalist or some such rot to suggest it, but you've juxtaposed "protection" with "birth control" as if the worst thing that could happen to adolescents who have sex without contraception is pregnancy. That entirely cuts out HALF of the population, and if we believe the stats published by CDC, which say more boys have sex in their teens than girls, then we are focusing on LESS THAN HALF of those at risk.

Government subsidized birth control (Plan B or b/c pills) won't reduce incidences of STDs, and only a fool makes that leap of illogic.

It may reduce incidences of pregnancy, but adolescent "reproductive rights" are greater than merely preventing pregnancy, they are about reducing the risks to ALL adolescents of freely engaging in consensual sexual activity (with their peers).

I think you have gone off track, and your "advocacy" is an insidious neglect of adolescent boys, an increase in "responsible" sexual behavior from whom would GREATLY reduce both incidences of STDs and pregnancy. As such, your heavy bias towards the sexual activity of adolescent girls (a mere 1/2 of the adolescent population) does little to actually help solve the problem, and is just a self-serving rant against government policy you don't agree with.

Personally, I think you suffer the same blindness as many physicians: preferring medication (hormonal birth control) over education and behavior change. This isn't treating a disease, it's preventive "medicine" ... why put introduce chemicals into a healthy body?? Esp. when that body is a system still in dramatic flux??

You also suffer the blindness of modern liberalism: that people can do nothing without the government to tell them or do it for them. give a couple b/c pills, and you may prevent a pregnancy (not STDs) but you WILL create dependence. Teach them responsible behavior (ie. non chem contraception) and the consequences for irresponsibility, and you create FREEDOM.

But I suppose that is too radical for you...